Relevant to last week's discussion of poetry & war: John Tipton has a new translation of Ajax-goes-to-Iraq: Tipton, who is highly conscious of the resonances of Sophocles' play with the current conflict in Iraq, includes a number of anachronisms, which anchor the play firmly in the present. For instance, his Ajax kills himself with Hector's gun, not his sword (a distracting mistake is that this Ajax also claims to be killed with "my own weapon," rather than simply "self-killed"); the Chorus compares Ajax to "a fast aircraft" and meditates on "the statistics of missiles." There are more obscenities than the conventions of Greek tragedy would have allowed: when Ajax realizes that he has "murdered farm animals" instead of soldiers, he shouts "Fuck. FUCK!" These details make it clear that we are to see these soldiers as modern combatants, struggling with the physical realities of modern warfare. (Via Philip Metres, who is I think too quick to identify Ajax & Achilles as sufferers of PTSD . . . .)
I commend to you PrimatePoetics, in which "Great apes using human language are creating a new literature": We are using the term poetry in a special sense. Poetry is a state of language in which we can't be sure to recognize it if we see it. Notice that our definition rejects as poetry most of the stuff written in broken lines which passes for poetry today. The very fact that there is still furious debate about the very existence of ape language shows that the language is still in its poetic phase.
Seth Abrams on the state of small poetry presses: out of the one hundred independent publishers of poetry in the United States I researched, I can only say for certain that two of them offer no-fee year-round readings of unsolicited full manuscripts.
Tess Taylor has a poem, "World's End: North of San Francisco," in Guernica: Here at the continent’s end, fortifications /linger for the end of the world. They greet / each California morning, these barracks in the fog.
Let me send American readers off for the holiday weekend with a beach-reading recommendation: Ciaran Carson's translation of The Táin, which came out in the US in February. The Táin is usually described as the Irish Beowulf--and there is *lots* of heroic violence, but also quick wit and raunchy fun for all! Screw Batman--I want to see Cú Chulainn: In that great massacre on Muirthemne Plain Cú Chulainn slew seven score and ten kings as well as innumerable dogs and horses, women and children, not to mention underlings and rabble; and not one man in three escaped without a staved head, or a broken leg, or a burst eye, or without being scarred for life in some way. And Cú Chulainn came away from that encounter without so much as a scrape or scratch on himself, or his man, or his horses.
A perfect example of rock parody-as-study guide is “Learn Some Deuteronomy,” perhaps my favorite ApologetiX song. The tune is Def Leppard’s 1987 hit “Pour Some Sugar On Me,” said to be the greatest strip club song of all time. Here’s ApologetiX’s chorus:
Take your Bible—Shake it off
Everybody—breaks the law
Learn some Deuteronomy—can you name those laws
Learn from Deuteronomy—c’mon try because
Learn your Deuteronomy—you ain’t good enough
God’s Law—is tricky to keep—born again you must be, yeah
As a cautionary tale about promiscuity, the book is a total failure. Easy is the slutty equivalent of Reefer Madness: Instead of marijuana that leads to murder, prostitution, and death, sex leads to disease, pregnancy, and social isolation. Jessica learns the error of her ways before the end of the school year and comes clean with her friend Elisabeth. Elisabeth asks, “Would you do it again?” “I consider this. ‘Only with someone I really loved. And only if I felt ready,’” Jessica answers.
]]>While die-cut hardcovers can be pretty great, the problem with die-cut paperbacks is that they are always getting torn. My local used bookstore always has one such book -- usually V.C. Andrews, with a ghoulish woman staring out of a die-cut keyhole -- that’s been Scotch-taped together by some diligent employee. My dad just bought me the paperback reprint of The God of Animals by Aryn Kyle (he seems to think I love horses, when in fact I am terribly afraid of them), which has a horse cut-out on the cover, framing a sky filled with brilliant stars. Except that my copy took a beating in my dad’s briefcase, so that the curled front leg came off and it looks like the horse is pregnant with a trapezoidal foal.
The Book Design Review posted on Jamie Keenan’s cover for The Drunkard’s Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives, which has letters cut out of the jacket to form an anagram of the word “random.” The comments section features a lively debate between a bookseller and designer David Drummond on the subject of easily-ruined covers.
]]>Tom Wolfe in conversation with Michael Gazzaniga (Human: The Science Behind What Makes Us Unique) about free will and neuroscience.
Jenny Diski's essay on South Africa for London Review of Books.
The ‘you can’t understand until you’ve lived there’ argument had kept me from visiting South Africa quite effectively. If being there would make me understanding about apartheid, I preferred to stay away.
]]>Wrapped in its peculiar atmosphere, as if draped in clouds, I walked entranced to my desk at about 4am and typed it on to the screen. The story was called "Nadine at Forty". In its subject matter, in its tone, its setting, it bore no relation to anything I have ever written before or since. It extended itself easily into paragraphs, requiring little correction and not really admitting any; how could my waking self revise what my sleeping self had imagined?
]]>The Washington Post asked me to write a response, and I did.
Instead, publishers seem to be taking the music industry's lead on how to respond to this whole online thing, which goes something like this: "LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU." And no, mailing every book you produce to a long list of bloggers does not count as embracing new media. Look what happened, for example, when Anne Enright won the Man-Booker Prize. When a heretofore-obscure writer was suddenly appearing in every major British and American newspaper, readers started Googling her name -- only to find a Wikipedia entry. There was no author Web site and no information about her backlist on her publisher's Web site. (And have you seen her publisher's Web site? Horrors.) Publishers complain about the lack of interest in literary fiction, and yet when it exists, they fail miserably at nurturing it.
]]>Bookslut fails, however, to address women’s inequality. It fails to offer a feminist, non-patriarchal vision of sex and women’s passion for reading and creating. Using women as sexualized commodity to sell literary magazines is not a feminist sexual revolution, and moreover, Cripsin’s choice to do that affects more women than just herself. Women who are not interested in reclaiming hate words now must deal with them more frequently in literary circles.
Oh dear. Still processing, but I think it important to say that I understand some women have problems with the word "slut." I do not have that problem. Nor bitch. Cunt, maybe. Sometimes. But this woman's assertion that I am "a slut for Thomas Mallon" is really too funny to even respond to. My riled up inner feminist gets mightily pissed off at the assertion that I am harming women by running Bookslut, however. Maybe we should have a cleaned up version of the site for sensitive feminists, put some pants on the chiquita up on top, change it to Book Lady of a Certain Character. Bookladyofacertaincharacter.com is, believe it or not, available.
Updated to add: As weird as I feel about the "Why I'll Never Be a Bookslut" essay, I do have to say that men blogging/commenting on the essay, saying that a 12-year-old girl should take "nice tits" as a compliment should be seriously ashamed of themselves.
]]>
You Don’t Know Me: A Citizen’s Guide to Republican Family Values by Win McCormack is really great bathroom reading. Organized alphabetically by topic, which range from the curious (Falafel) to the depraved (Beastiality -- that one was committed by Neal Horsley who started a website “advocating the murder of abortion doctors and imprisoning homosexuals”), this book is the perfect reminder that the people who are the loudest anti-sex crusaders are often the ones most likely to be doing the very thing they oppose (Rev. Ted Haggard, Larry Craig).
The book also gives me hope. Under the heading, Father/Son Bonding, McCormack writes:
At the 1988 Republican National Convention, when George H.W. Bush was running for president of the United States, future president George W. Bush was asked by a Hartford Courant reporter what he and his father talked about when they weren’t talking about politics.
Bush’s answer: "Pussy."
I don’t know, I mean after all we’ve endured during this administration and Bush pere’s reign, I just like to believe that they were sitting there counting their blood money and talking about the best ways to give oral. I’m an optimist. (Private message to GW -- check out She Comes First for tips on getting ladies off. It’ll keep them coming back for more!)
My favorite section in the book is Bad Sex Writing. And this, gentle reader is where today’s Sticky Pages is drawn from. Everyone loves a little girl on girl action.
McCormack takes a quote from Sisters, a 1981 novel penned by Ms. Lynne Cheney.
Page 46, You Don’t Know Me
The women who embraced in the wagon were Adam and Eve crossing a dark cathedral stage -- no, Eve and Eve, loving one another as they would not be able to once they ate of the fruit and knew themselves as they truly were. She felt curiously moved, curiously envious… she saw that the women in the cart had a passionate, loving intimacy forever closed to her… Let us go away together, away from the anger and imperatives of men… And then we shall go to bed, our bed, my dearest girl.
Yowza! Excuse me while I find a quiet place to finish eating of the fruit and getting to know myself as I truly am.
Happy Tuesday!
]]>Well, in my situation, until Drawn & Quarterly came along, I couldn't find a publisher who was interested in my work at all. There was no one.
]]>